Days since beginning: 1067
You can be notified of when this site is updated!
At: Dec 05 2008 00:00Z
|
Friday, October 31, 2008 - 13:14:25 ET
Let's take a look at an example METAR with CRFI data in it: CYFB CRFI 17/35 -22 .34 0201190630 In order, the block of data contains:
So the CRFI for runway 17/35 is 0.34. We can use this value now to figure out how much extra runway we may need on landing. Let's take a look at Table 1 in the AIM, Section AIR 1.6.6. You can also find the CRFI charts in the CFS. If your performance calculations indicate that you will need 2000 feet of runway to land, with a CRFI of 0.34, you will in fact need 4170 feet. We used table one because the type of aircraft we're flying does not have discing or thrust reversers. One thing to note. These distances assume that you're wheels do not lock/skid when you apply brakes. It is important to do all your performance calculations first, then use the table to find out the extra distance needed due to the CRFI. It's not recommended that you extrapolate the data in the tables either. You should also round down to the nearest CRFI value. Table three allows you to figure out your maximum allowable crosswind. It's your standard cross-wind chart/calculator with the addition of CFRI values along the top and bottom. Looking at the chart, you can see that the maximum allowable crosswind for a CRFI of 0.34 is approx 12knots. At that speed and above, you may be unable to stay on the runway as the wind will blow your aircraft off to the side as there is insufficient friction on the runway to keep you in place. In my next post, I am going to talk another winter tool that complements the CRFI. It's the runway surface condition report! Stay Tuned. Comments (2) | Permalink | Category: Airmanship, Ground School, Training
Thursday, October 30, 2008 - 13:39:11 ET
Back in January of 2007, I breifly talked about the Canadian Runway Friction Index (CRFI). With the recent winter-like weather in Southern Ontario I figured this would be a good time to go into more detail. Most progression in aviation safety is usually prompted by a previous accident or incident. The creation of the CRFI was no exception. A Fokker F-28 slid off the end of the runway at Dryden in March 1989, killing 24 of the 69 persons on board. An inquiry was created and the Dryden Commission stressed the need to come up with a way to measure and apply corrective measures for differing runway surface conditions. Transport Canada teamed up with NASA (along with French and Norwegian authorities) to come up with a way to measure runway conditions. The study was started in 1996 and it's aim was the following:
Tests were performed in North Bay, Ontario, Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia, Oslo Gardermoen Airport, Munich and at Erding Airbase. Tests were also conducted at Prague Airport in the Czech Republic and at the New Chitose Airport, hosted by the Japanese civil aviation authority. A database was developed and made available that contains test data from over 38,500 runs with 44 devices of 14 different makes. Test surfaces include at least six different ice conditions, packed snow, loose snow from .25 mm to 100 mm, and over 30 wet and dry surfaces. Test temperatures range from -25°C to +10°C. In the end, two standards were created.. The CRFI as well as an international version called IRFI. A survey in 2001 was released to over 3,000 airline transport pilots requesting their input on how they use the CRFI. Here are some of the findings:
Even for light aircraft, the CRFI is still an important part of your flight planning. One thing I've noticed, especially at Buttonville, is the lack of updates to the reported CRFI. In my experience the CRFI has only been updated once, during the morning, and that's it. I'm glad they do it anyways. Tomorrow I will talk about how to apply the CRFI to your flight planning. How to use the available graphs as well as how to calculate any increase in take-off and landing distances. Stay Tuned. References: http://www.tc.gc.ca/TDC/publication/tp13361e/13361e.htm Comments (2) | Permalink | Category: Airmanship, Ground School, Training
Friday, June 13, 2008 - 15:50:09 ET
One thing you need to do that wasn't really taught (to me) was how to calculate when you're flying at night (or Legal Night as us pilots like to call it). This is important for a few reasons: - If you don't have a night rating, you need to know when you need to be wheels down and engine off. First, lets define when nighttime for the purposes of aviation and your log book starts and ends. GEN 1.6.2 Says: In the morning, Twilight begins when the sun is 6° below the horizon ascending, and ends at sunrise, approximately 25 minutes later. In the evening, Twilight begins at sunset, and ends when the sun is 6° below the horizon descending, approximately 25 minutes later. Who did what in the where now?!? In other words... Dawn is 25 minutes before sunrise, Dusk ends 25 minutes after sunset. So we know when Twilight starts and ends for both the morning and evening. How does that apply to finding out when it's nighttime? We need to turn to CAR 101.01 for that: "night" - means the time between the end of evening civil twilight and the beginning of morning civil twilight; (nuit) So in other words, "night" for the purposes of aviation starts 25 minutes after sunset and 25 minutes before sunrise. Great! So uhmm.. how do I find out when sunrise and sunset are? Here are a few ideas: - Hand held (and probably aviation) GPS units have that information in a menu someplace. No matter what way you use to get the information be sure you do the following: - If you are given values for sunset and sunrise, add 25 minutes to the sunset time, and subtract 25 minutes from the sunrise time to give you legal night. This is another reason to keep track of your start-up and shut-down times. As this can occur on a day/night boundary. Ie, you need to log your 2 hour flight as 1.1 in day and 0.9 in night. Comments (4) | Permalink | Category: Air Law, Ground School, Training
Friday, April 4, 2008 - 13:26:25 ET
A friend of mine mentioned that it would be cool to have "a million dollars" to have his own airport. I told him that all you need is space to land an airplane and you can do just that, legally. Without referencing anything, I told him that you are allowed to land on private property as long as you have permission. If you own the land, then there should be no question as to the legal ramifications of landing an airplane on your parcel of land. The conversation ended there but I decided to look further into things like getting your "airport" listed in the CFS. Let's start with the most basic of aerodromes. A grass strip on your farmland. It's literally just a 3000 foot by 50 foot strip of mowed grass. Just enough to get your 172 airborne and land safely. Since the winds in Canada are primarily from the west, your strip is orientated in an east/west direction. Runway 27/09. You own the land. Therefore you have the right to land and take off your aircraft from that grass strip. Your friend asks you if he can use it to, you say "yes". He is now legally allowed to land on your grass strip. After a summer of take-offs and landings at your grass strip, your neighbour starts complaining that what you're doing is illegal. CAR 602.14(2) states that you are allowed to fly "low" and close to people or property as long as you are conducting a take-off or landing. As long as you're not buzzing your neighbours house, what you are doing is totally legal. Yes, your grass strip is technically an "Aerodrome". The following year you've added a windsock so that you can tell which direction the wind is coming from. You also would like to add your aerodrome to the CFS so that fellow pilots can find information about your grass strip. Since there is a windsock now, the minimum requirement for registering an aerodrome, you put your request in to the Minister to add your aerodrome to the CFS. CAR 301.03 outlines what minimum requirements are needed before you can register your aerodrome. Technically, you don't even need a windsock if you are able to determine the wind direction by means of smoke, or ripples in water. Your little grass strip is now a registered aerodrome. It will appear in the CFS and on aeronautical charts. I have noticed a few such aerodromes in the CFS. Particularly New Liskeard (CPX3) aerodrome. This aerodrome interests me because it is close to Cobalt, Ontario. The town my girlfriend grew up. I think it would be cool to visit her family one day by plane. Anyways. Pretty much anyone can have a registered aerodrome in Canada. If you'd like to run an airport, well thats a different cup of tea. Registration means it appears in the CFS and is registered with the Government as an aerodrome. The registration of an aerodrome with Transport Canada is handeled by each regional office of TC. The registration form for an aerodrome in Ontario can be found Certification means that it is an airport and compiles with CAR 302. this includes things like having an Airport Operations Manual, application for a certificate, and minimum obligations of the airport operator. Comments are welcome. Comments (3) | Permalink | Category: Air Law, Ground School, Interesting Things, Training
Saturday, December 23, 2006 - 13:29:18 ET
Documents and Airworthiness Certificate of Registration Q: How long is the Certificate of Registration valid? What invalidates it? Q: How long does the owner of an aircraft have to notify the Minister of Transport for a change of address? Q: What is the procedure with respect to the Certificate of Registration when the aircraft is sold? Certificate of Airworthiness Q: What temporarily invalidates the Certificate of Airworthiness? Q: How often must the Certificate of Airworthiness be re-validated? Q: How is it revalidated? Q: Is a Certificate of Airworthiness issued for amateur-built aircraft? Weight and Balance Report Q: Define maximum takeoff weight Q: How does the maximum take off weight differ from the maximum ramp weight? Q: Who prepares the Weight and Balance document that must be carried on board? Q: Show the actual Basic Empty Weight and Gross Weight for the test aircraft. Q: What is the difference between normal and utility categories? Q: What can the pilot learn of the categories for which the aircraft is approved as well as any related limitations? Q: Is an aircraft considered airworthy if overloaded? Why? Q:How often does an aircraft have to be re-weighed? Q: What important information is found on the original Weight and Balance Report that will not be found elsewhere? Comments (3) | Permalink | Category: Air Law, Ground School
Wednesday, September 27, 2006 - 21:29:14 ET
I am going to illustrate how to intercept a NDB track using MS Flight Simulator 2004 in a perfect world (no wind to worry about). There are certain times that you will need to track to a NDB at a particular heading. This is mainly used in two situations: 1. You are using NDB (LF/MF) airways. In this example we want to intercept the Buttonville (KZ) NDB at 150°. Step One - Tune and Identify ![]() If you don't hear any Morse code, then the station is un-serviceable and cannot be used for navigation. If you hear Morse code and it is not what is to be expected, double check your frequency. Step Two - Parallel Your Track Turn your airplane to a heading of 150° (3) and note that the bearing to the NDB station is 50°[1] to the right (4). ![]() The rule of thumb to use is to add 30° to your bearing to station and turn that many degrees towards the ADF needle. There is one exception though. You never want to turn more than 90° so you add 30° to whatever your ADF needle shows to a maximum of 90°. In this case 30°+ 50° = 80° Step Three - Intercepting The Track
![]() Step Four - Flying To The NDB
Just keep on this heading and you will cross over the NDB. You will notice that the bearing to the station is 0° (because the needle is pointing to north)(9) ![]() How do you know when you've crossed over the NDB? When the needle swings 180° and points behind you.(10) ![]()
Comments (0) | Permalink | Category: Ground School, Instruments
|
|