From NavCanada:

NAV CANADA, the country’s provider of civil air navigation services, recently completed an aeronautical study of the airspace in the London, Ontario area. The study recommended a change to the airspace classification at the London Airport.

A Control Zone classification change from Class D to Class C transponder mode C required) will enable more effective and efficient provision of air traffic control (ATC) services at the London Airport.

This change will take effect March 12, 2009 at 09:01 Coordinated Time Universal Time (UTC). The appropriate aeronautical publications will be amended.

Official announcement …

The blogosphere has been pretty quiet as of late. I’m planning a post on cold weather and how it affects the altimeter.

I noticed yesterday that my site search is broken (most likely from the movable type upgrade I did). I couldn’t get it fixed yesterday, so its still broken. It returns all pages regardless if your search term appears in it or not.

I’ll let you know when it’s fixed.

Ever since I started flying, I’ve been hearing anecdotal evidence that the 200 hour mark is a pilots career is one of the most dangerous.

I’ve spent a few hours trying to find hard evidence of such and cant find any data that supports this claim.

Does anyone have any ideas where I can find information from reputable sources (NASA, TC, AOPA, COPA, etc..) that shows data and explains why 200 hours is such a precarious milestone in a pilots career? (I think there is another one at 1,500 hours too)